|PLoS Genetics (2006) 2(4):e29|
|Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium|
(click to unfold)
RIKEN's FANTOM project has revealed many previously unknown coding sequences, as well as an unexpected degree of variation in transcripts resulting from alternative promoter usage and splicing. ...
Ever more transcripts that do not code for proteins have been identified by transcriptome studies, in general. Increasing evidence points to the important cellular roles of such non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). The distinction of protein-coding RNA transcripts from ncRNA transcripts is therefore an important problem in understanding the transcriptome and carrying out its annotation. Very few in silico methods have specifically addressed this problem. Here, we introduce CONC (for "coding or non-coding"), a novel method based on support vector machines that classifies transcripts according to features they would have if they were coding for proteins. These features include peptide length, amino acid composition, predicted secondary structure content, predicted percentage of exposed residues, compositional entropy, number of homologs from database searches, and alignment entropy. Nucleotide frequencies are also incorporated into the method. Confirmed coding cDNAs for eukaryotic proteins from the Swiss-Prot database constituted the set of true positives, ncRNAs from RNAdb and NONCODE the true negatives. Ten-fold cross-validation suggested that CONC distinguished coding RNAs from ncRNAs at about 97% specificity and 98% sensitivity. Applied to 102,801 mouse cDNAs from the FANTOM3 dataset, our method reliably identified over 14,000 ncRNAs and estimated the total number of ncRNAs to be about 28,000.
|genetics classification |
|Animals Molecular Sequence Data Proteins RNA Mice RNA, Messenger Transcription, Genetic Genetic Code Expressed Sequence Tags Models, Theoretical Databases, Nucleic Acid Genetic Variation Genetic Vectors Models, Genetic Protein Biosynthesis ROC Curve Reproducibility of Results |
|72 (Last update: 11/10/2018 6:08:47pm)|
|PLoS Genet. 2006 Apr;2(4):e29. Epub 2006 Apr 28.|